Syria

I believe there are a few questions that the U.S. must consider before jumping into action in regards to Syria. With US involvement comes the potential loss of US soldiers and ammunition. Firstly, should the strikes backfire, is there a possibility of Syrian retaliation against the US and its people? A seemingly good idea at first may backfire on us in the long run, putting our country and its civilians in danger. Secondly, how many more innocent people would have to die? The strikes would inevitably wipe out more families and children, although granted significantly less than that caused by chemical weapons. US men and women may also be lost. Thirdly, would the strikes really even make a stand against chemical warfare, or would they be ignored down the road by other aggressive powers? Strong powers such as Russia may disregard the United States' attempt of a taking a stand. There are both pros and cons if the US intervenes. If the US intervened, it would make a stand against the use of chemical weapons, which are against the "norm" in warfare nowadays. On the other hand, since President Obama has not acted immediately but rather has had Congress review the action, the impact may not be as great. The specified countries know he has hesitated with his decision, which the countries may not take as seriously and may then regard loosely. If the US intervenes, other countries may follow suit and take a stand against chemical warfare as well. However, a US intervention may lead to possible war involvement in the future. Also, a unilateral strike would not be in our best interest; an international stand would send a much greater and more powerful message. A US intervention would bring some hope to the Syrian people. I think the Catholic faith and Tradition would suggest trying to maintain peaceful relations with Syria. I also think the Catholic faith and Tradition would say that it is not a just war to be fought, and we have no business in intervening in a harmful or deadly way.